| "What the Papers Said" - from Shropshire Caving & Mining Club Archives |
| Colliery Guardian, 20th March 1858 FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT AT MADELEY A Sinker’s Claim for Wages. |
|||
| AT the last sitting of the Madeley County Court, before Uyedale Corbett, Esq., judge, a rough spun collier named Hodgkiss, usually designated “Ben the Sinker,” from his following that occupation, summoned a German gentleman, known as Dr. Reider, or Donster Swivel Redivivus, who has been engaged under Mr. Moseley, of Buildwas Park, in sinking for coal in a spot where the results of the Government survey, and the experience of scientific and practical men, forbid the supposition of coal being found. Plaintiff claimed £1 4s. for wages. Defendant denied the justice of the debt. Plaintiff said, he was a sinker, working for 4s, a-day and two quarts of ale. On the 24th December, defendant gave him and four others notice to quit on the next Saturday. On the Monday there was no work ; it was the wake. On the Tuesday worked a sinker’s day, that is to seven o’clock. Dr. Reider came to the pit. I said, “ there are four rings of brick in want of finishing; we have been working ever since eight o’clock, and if some one does not stay to finish it there will be no work for the men in the morning; if it is done they can work.” Defendant said, “Ben, there was one day last week you only did two hours’ work.” I replied, “I was four hours looking for a house for you.” I said, “Tell me who told you.” He refused, ordered me off the ground, and waved his stick. He said if I would go he would pay me according to agreement. I asked him for my money on the Tuesday, and he said, “Come down to Buildwas Inn on Saturday.” I went on the Friday for my tools. On the Saturday I went to Rockson. He said, “I have left the money with thy father.” I found he had left 4s. I then went to Squire Moseley, and he said he left it all to the defendant. The defendant said he would pay when the Squire gave his consent. |
Mrs. Hodgkiss, mother of plaintiff, attended to corroborate the statement of her son.— Joseph Reider, the defendant in the case said : The man had behaved bad in the shaft, was oftener drunk than sober, and cursed me and Mr. Moseley. I gave him a week’s notice. They took a holiday on Monday. I complained on the Tuesday that they had not worked. On Monday Hodgkiss cursed and abused me. I said he should go, or I would send for a policeman. He refused to go unless I gave him a week’s wages. I said if he would go quietly, and not show his impudent face or nose again, I would pay him. I said if Mr. Moseley would pay it he should have it. A good deal of amusement was afforded the Court by the cross-questions put by plaintiff, who had to stand on the opposite side of the table to prevent violence.— John Hughes said : Dr. Reider told plaintiff that if he would stay away from the place he should be paid.—Plaintiff put some questions to witness relative to the play on Monday, alternately called. a strike, a festival, and a wake. A man named Roberts was next examined, to show that Monday was not a general holiday.—His Honour decided, under the circumstances of plaintiff’s abusive manner, to give judgment for defendant. |
||
| Submitted by Steve Dewhirst |
|